Monday, March 14, 2011

Goalie Pad Difference

E 'OFFICIAL: There was the explosive in the Twin Towers!


Now it's official. Traces of nano-thermite explosives were collected from the debris of the WTC collapse shortly after 11 / 9 / 2001.

At Brigham Young University physics professor, Dr. Steven Jones, made the discovery of explosives along with an international team of nine scientists.

Thanks then to the more extensive laboratory testing, scientists have concluded that the specimen showed that these nano-thermite explosives, generally used for military purposes.

After a rigorous peer-review process, their paper was published in Bentham Chemical Physics Journal, one of the most authoritative journals in the U.S. and has approved some Nobel Prize winners, being respected within the scientific community. First author of the study is Dr. Niels Harrit 37, a chemistry professor at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and an expert in nano-chemistry, which says: "The official put forth NIST violates the fundamental laws of physics. "

The Government is now aware of evidence that confirm the presence of explosive Nano-Thermite, used to bring down the towers of the WTC on 9 / 11.


how could place explosives in the Twin Towers?


INTERVIEW WITH SCOTT FORBES.
Adapted from
georgewashington.blogspot.com . Translated by Gianluca Freda .

Scott Forbes, who worked in the south tower of World Trade Center, testifies to the power failure in the tower for 26 hours straight during the first weekend of September 11.


GENERAL

Question: In 2001, she worked as an information technology specialist for Fiduciary Trust. For the company, she was the primary specialist or just an assistant?

SF: worked in a department of about 100 people as a senior database administrator "and the role of parent.

Q: At that time Fiduciary Trust occupied floors 90 ° and 94-97 ° of the south tower She worked specifically in one of these plans or her job forced her to pass normally from one floor to another?

SF: I and my colleagues worked on the 97th floor ... we could meet during the day or offer assistance to staff on other floors but most of the time we spent on the 97th floor.


THE WEEKEND 8 and 9 September 2001

D: She said that the weekend of 8 and 9 September 2001 there was a power in Tower 2 of the World Trade Center, known as the south tower, and that this interruption lasted about 36 hours and affect plans by the 50th over. Can you tell us what time began?

SF: All systems were switched off in the morning of Saturday, and interruption of current began at about noon on Saturday, September 8, 2001.

Q: When ended?

SF: More or less at 14.00 Sunday, September 9, 2001. [So about 26 hours of continuous interruption.]

D: How can you be sure the electricity is missing in all the planes from 50 ° if the Fiduciary Trust was much higher, between 90 ° and 97 °?

SF: absolutely can not certify that there was no electricity on the lower floors. All I know is that we were informed of the interruption of the current, we had to shut down all systems and start again the next day.

D: She said she learned of the interruption of power because he worked in the department of information technology that weekend and was forced to work together with many others to ensure that the systems could be turned off and then turned back on safely. How many other people of Fiduciary Trust worked together to you? Can anyone confirm your story?

SF: Many, many people worked during the power failure, both in the department of information technology is the commercial sector, when restoring the system back online. There are others who can testify to that. Some do not remember these things, others prefer not to think back to that time, but others have no difficulty in acknowledging that there was a power failure and can confirm my testimony.

D: She said the reason given by the World Trade Center or Port Authority for the power failure was that the building installation needed to be updated. You know which parts of the building were affected by the renovation and what was the extent of? In other words, the area where the work was performed was close to outer walls of the tower? Close to the nucleus? O was in the middle?

SF: I have no knowledge of this and I can not comment ...

D: She also said that since there is current, security cameras were turned off. How do you know? They could not be generators that provided energy to the security cameras?

SF: In my company the security cameras were checked continuously and movies stored for any feedback. Worked with the normal power and then had to be turned off, like all other electrical systems.

D: She also stated that in case of power failure, the doors were equipped with safety locks. It refers only to the external ports or even outside the office? The locks were electric or key? If they were electric, battery operation?

SF: I was referring to emergency doors which gave access to the levels where it was my company (and others). I do not think there were battery-powered ports.

D: She also said that they saw many "technical" enter and exit the tower. He has personally seen any of them?

SF: Yes "technical" I mean the workers in work clothes.

D: These people look "Middle Eastern"?

SF: No, not particularly. I mean, I do not remember noticing that they belonged to a particular ethnic group rather than another.

D: He acknowledged that someone had already participated in other "work" inside the tower?

SF: No.


the morning of 11 September

D: the morning of 11 September she was at his house on the shore of Jersey City and - as said - she was convinced "immediately that something was happening that had to do with the work carried out during the weekend. " What made him think that?

SF: When the South Tower collapsed like a column of sand, it seemed unreal and inconceivable, and thought immediately that something strange was happening. My suspicions grew a few months later when the power failure was not allowed and was indeed, in some cases, denied by the authorities.


THE Sept. 11 commission

D: Finally, she said he had offered his information to the Commission on September 11, but it has not expressed interest. How has provided its information to the Commission (by phone, e-mail, letter)?

SF: I contacted the Commission through its website and by mail. But I never received a reply nor been contacted.

D: The Commission has never made a living with her?

SF: No.

Q: Is there else who would like to tell us?

SF: I have another interesting information ... after September 11, my company, along with others, was in a temporary seat of New Jersey to face the consequences of the disaster. In that area there were literally hundreds and hundreds of eyewitnesses of the events of September 11. As a British citizen I was contacted by Scotland Yard for an interview about the events ... but I always wondered why the American authorities, the police in New York ol'FBI, they never came to interview all the witnesses who were in New Jersey . At best I would call it negligence, incompetence ... at worst.

0 comments:

Post a Comment