Sometimes there really limit all'indecenza.
happens that throws you in the face of the record in the case of two guards Ecozoofile that, in a speech to a notification of the seizure of several dogs kept in such conditions as to set up an abuse, are killed by the owner of the dogs who then committed suicide.
Beyond the evaluation of each particular case is a tragedy.
But to make it, if possible, worse still lacked the right to comment Federfauna (which are not carried over the link because I do not want to soil my blog) accusing the tragedy of animal welfare organizations that act, according to them, so that cause such events. A justification for a double murder that made me the creeps. Speculation pure three corpses still warm.
I wrote the letter to these gentlemen that you find below. Do you too in your own words.
the Presidency, Management and Decision-making bodies of all Federfauna.
I read your comment "Tragedy in Liguria. FederFauna serves reverse !..." of 13.05.2010 published on your site with astonished indignation.
Incredulous, before deciding to write, I have taken care to verify that it is not finished on the wrong site and wrong not to have misunderstood the meaning of the words 'open mouth' the sorrow I've read.
It is worth remembering that your association is, I think if unique in the world, an association founded with the explicit purpose (and just as explicitly represented on your site) to fight that you have the nerve to call 'pseudo-animal rights'. Does not represent a 'pro' but then the absurdity of representation 'against'.
With a genesis of this type and with the hatred that you frigates publicly disseminated, even to its statutory mission, not just intelligence but also plain common sense would suggest to anyone not to throw in comments on the latest news stories .
This was not, and then, in this absurd representation of the world on the other hand, tap the hassle of having to also comment regarding the contents of your comment.
again maybe we should remember that your representatives are breeders, pet stores, wholesalers and importers, circuses and zoos. In essence, any entity that makes the animals a reason to work. Gain per se can not find at all objectionable, provided that it is the result of activities that are based primarily on respect for life and animal welfare. I'm an educator so I also have dog in the relationship with animals as a source of income. Obviously my work is light years away from the overwhelming majority of your associates because my activity in the premise and goal of animal welfare and, as we both know, is not the same for all the people you represent.
E 'frankly appalling that, in your position, you would like to acknowledge the animal welfare organizations to make a business of the animals. I fear that in a fit of defense of the indefensible, you have completely lost touch with reality. Zoophilia know how many guards who are enriched through voluntary activity? How many associations active in kennels know rich and profitable? Which distorted the world in front of you?
A tragedy is a tragedy. Point.
The only thing that makes me even more bitter to think of the tragedy is the death of three people know of someone who, like you, do not hesitate to distort without speculating on the three bodies.
comforts me, just the fact that what you call 'pseudo culture,' the culture of who you think does nothing but launch 'screams, insults and picturesque events' is clearly a growing culture that if he made mistakes is correcting them. A real culture, not based on the interest but on universal principles. A culture that, hopefully, will wipe out the disgraceful claim that support your representation.
I think a good lawyer would see set up in the presentation of your association and your comment to chronicle the apology of crime and incitement to hatred. I urge you to correct as soon as possible and to eliminate the first permanently from your site for the second show a bit of common sense which so far have not seen the track in your behavior.
Joseph Luscia
